Multilevel Reading as an Epistemological Model of Islam-Science Integration: A Critical Study of Nidhal Guessoum

Authors

  • Mohammad Muslih Universitas Darussalam Gontor https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8890-5215
  • Erni Puryati Ningsih Universitas Darussalam Gontor
  • Rahmat Nur Rifa Da'i Universitas Darussalam Gontor
  • Adi Setiawan International Islamic Call College Tripoli, Libya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21111/jios.v4i1.107

Keywords:

Multilevel Reading, Islam-Science Integration, Epistemology, Hermeneutics, Nidhal Guessoum

Abstract

This article aims to examine and analyze Nidhal Guessoum’s concept of multilevel reading as an epistemological model of Islam-science integration. Specifically, it investigates the epistemological foundations, methodological structure, and logical consistency of Guessoum’s approach in reconciling revelation and scientific rationality.  Employing qualitative library research, this study uses epistemological, hermeneutical, and philosophy of science approaches to critically evaluate Guessoum’s thought. The findings show that multilevel reading represents an attempt to establish a dialogical relationship between religion and science without reducing one into the other. Guessoum rejects both scientism and literalism by proposing contextual and layered interpretations of religious texts. This approach enables a more flexible interaction between Qur’anic interpretation and contemporary scientific developments. However, the study also finds that the model still faces several methodological challenges, particularly regarding interpretive ambiguity and epistemological consistency. Despite these limitations, Guessoum’s framework contributes significantly to the development of contemporary Islamic epistemology by offering a more contextual, critical, and integrative paradigm of Islam-science relations. Therefore, multilevel reading can be regarded as an important alternative model in contemporary   discussions on religion and science.

References

Ahmed Malik, Shoaib. Islam and Evolution: Al-Ghazālī and the Modern Evolutionary Paradigm. London: Routledge, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429345753.

Al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. Islam and Secularism. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC, 1993.

———. Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam an Exposition of The Fundamental Elements of The Worlview of Islam. Edisi ke-1. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC, 1995.

Alak, Alina Isac. “The Islamic Humanist Hermeneutics: Definition, Characteristics, and Relevance.” Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 34, no. 4 (October 2023): 313–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2023.2282842.

Aljunied, Khairudin. “Osman Bakar and and Epistemological Renewal in the Muslim World.” Al-Shajarah: Journal of the International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC) 27, no. 1 (June 2022): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.31436/shajarah.v27i1.1388.

Aziz, Husein. “Epistemology of the Integration of Religion and Science Qur’anic Perspective.” Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman 33, no. 2 (August 2022): 239–64. https://doi.org/10.33367/tribakti.v33i2.2833.

Bagir, Zainal Abidin. “Practice and the Agenda of ‘Islam and Science.’” Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 47, no. 2 (June 2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2012.01260.x.

Bakar, Osman. “The Philosophical Foundations of Islamic Science.” Islam and Civilisational Renewal 13, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52282/icr.v13i1.915.

———. “The Qur’anic Identity of the Muslim Ummah: Tawhidic Epistemology as Its Foundation and Sustainer.” ICR Journal 3, no. 3 (April 2012): 438–54. https://doi.org/10.52282/icr.v3i3.531.

Bigliardi, Stefano. “The Contemporary Debate on the Harmony between Islam and Science: Emergence and Challenges of a New Generation.” Social Epistemology 28, no. 2 (April 2014): 167–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2013.782583.

Brooke, John Hedley. “Reconciling Religious Tradition and Modern Science.” Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 47, no. 2 (June 2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2012.01257.x.

Fahmi, Muhammad, Achmad Khudori Soleh, and Lia Cahyati. “The Concept of Religion-Science Integration: A Comparative Study of Naquib Al-Attas and Nidhal Guessoum.” DINIKA: Academic Journal of Islamic Studies 9, no. 2 (December 2024): 151–72. https://doi.org/10.22515/dinika.v9i2.8555.

Guessoum, Nidhal. Islam’s Quantum Question: Reconciling Muslim Tradition and Modern Science. London: I.B. Tauris, 2011.

———. “Islam and Science: The Next Phase of Debates.” Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 50, no. 4 (December 2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12213.

———. “Issues and Agendas of Islam and Science.” Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 47, no. 2 (June 2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2012.01261.x.

———. “The Qur’an, Science, and the (Related) Contemporary Muslim Discourse.” Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 43, no. 2 (June 2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2008.00925.x.

Hanif, Abdulloh. “Pembacaan Ilmiah Al-Qur’an: Kritik Nidhal Guessoum Atas Teori I’jaz.” KACA (Karunia Cahaya Allah): Jurnal Dialogis Ilmu Ushuluddin 12, no. 2 (August 2022): 205–26. https://doi.org/10.36781/kaca.v12i2.265.

Huda, Ali Anhar Syi’bul, Abid Nurhuda, Nur Aini Setyaningtyas, Muhammad Imam Syafi’i, and Farhan Akmala Putra. “Hermeneutika Dalam Ilmu-Ilmu Humaniora Dan Agama: Model, Pengembangan Dan Metode Penelitian.” Al-Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir 4, no. 1 (February 2025): 14–26. https://doi.org/10.58363/alfahmu.v4i1.239.

Iqbal, Mudzaffar. Islam and Science. New York: Routledge, 2002.

Jalajel, David Solomon, and Shoaib Ahmed Malik. “The Role of Classical Sunnī Theology in Islam and Science: Responding to Nidhal Guessoum.” Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 60, no. 1 (June 2025). https://doi.org/10.16995/zygon.16545.

Lohlker, Rüdiger, and Margareta Wetchy. “Colliding Epistemologies: Reflections on Nidhal Guessoum.” Interdisciplinary Journal for Religion and Transformation in Contemporary Society 7, no. 2 (December 2021): 426–46. https://doi.org/10.30965/23642807-bja10024.

Makiah, Zulpa. “Rekonsiliasi Islam Dan Sains Dalam Perspektif Nidhal Guessoum.” Khazanah: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Humaniora 19, no. 1 (July 2021): 61. https://doi.org/10.18592/khazanah.v19i1.4150.

Manilet, M. Jamil, and Farhan Afif Al Kindi. “Benturan Paradigma: Respons Terhadap Penggeseran Paradigma Islam.” Journal of Islamic and Occidental Studies 2, no. 1 (June 2024): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.21111/jios.v2i1.34.

Mezei, Balázs M. “The Sovereignty of Revelation: On Paul Ricœur’s Hermeneutics of Revelation.” Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 51, no. 3 (September 2022): 314–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/00084298211044814.

Moosa, Ebrahim. What Is a Madrasa? USA: University of North Carolina Press, 2015.

Muslih, Mohammad. Filsafat Ilmu: Kajian Atas Asumsi Dasar, Paradigma, Dan Kerangka Teori Ilmu Pengetahuan. Yogyakarta: Lesfi, 2021.

———. “Pemikiran Islam Kontemporer, Antara Mode Pemikiran Dan Model Pembacaan.” TSAQAFAH 8, no. 2 (November 2012): 347. https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v8i2.28.

Muslih, Mohammad, Yuangga K. Yahya, Sri Haryanto, and Aufa A. Musthofa. “Al-Qur’an-Based Paradigm in Science Integration at The Al-Qur’an Science University, Indonesia.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 80, no. 1 (March 2024). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v80i1.9459.

Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. Knowledge and the Sacred. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1989.

———. Religion and the Order of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

———. The Need for a Sacred Science. Albany: SUNY Press, 1993.

Nidzom, Muhammad Faqih; Amroin, Herlina Yunita; and Ramadhan, Mahendra Utama Cahya. “Nidhal Guessoum’s Method of Scientific Interpretation: An Analytical Study on Al-Ayah Al-Kauniyyah and Its Relevance to the Contemporary Urban Muslim Society.” Jurnal Pemikiran Islam 30, no. 2 (2025): 245–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32332/akademika.v30i2.11299.

Popper, Karl. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge, 2002.

Radner, Ephraim. “‘I Contain Multitudes’: The Divine Basis for the Theological Interpretation of Scripture.” Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology 31, no. 2 (May 2022): 142–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/10638512221084579.

Rahmani, Diah Ayu, Via Novelia Najmi, and Eva Dewi. “Reconstructing Islamic Epistemology: A Philosophical Analysis of Amin Abdullah’s Integrative–Interconnected Paradigm.” Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Al-Thariqah 11, no. 1 (May 2026): 169–82. https://doi.org/10.25299/althariqah.2026.vol11(1).27798.

Rediehs, Laura. “The Quaker Experiential Integration of Science and Religion.” Theology and Science 20, no. 2 (April 2022): 138–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2022.2051247.

Rofiq, Nur, and M. Zidny Nafi Hasbi. “Mendamaikan Tradisi Muslim Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Modern.” Al-Irfan : Journal of Arabic Literature and Islamic Studies 4, no. 2 (October 2021): 203–16. https://doi.org/10.36835/alirfan.v4i2.5003.

Rozikin, Ahmad Zainor, and Ihwan Amalih. “Integrasi Agama Dan Sains Perspektif Teori Quantum Nidhal Guessoum.” Multiverse: Open Multidisciplinary Journal 2, no. 3 (December 2023): 454–64. https://doi.org/10.57251/multiverse.v2i3.1330.

Saeed, Abdullah. Reading the Qur’an in the Twenty-First. London: Routledge, 2020. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429274114.

Sanda, Dragos, Luana Smarandoiu, and Costea Munteanu. “The Dialogue between Science and Religion: A Taxonomic Contribution.” Religions 8, no. 3 (March 2017): 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel8030035.

Sardar, Ziauddin. Islam, Postmodernism and Other Futures. London: Pluto Press, 2003.

Syarip, Syarip, Zuhdiyah Zuhdiyah, and Maryamah Maryamah. “Epistemological Foundations of Science and Technology in Islam: A Literature Review.” Academia Open 11, no. 1 (January 2026). https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.11.2026.13128.

Szakolczai, Arpad. “An Epistemology of Revelation.” Religions 15, no. 9 (September 2024): 1126. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15091126.

Taftazani, M. Fafiyadi ;Nafi’ah, Fitrotun. “Pendekatan Modernis Terhadap Al-Qur’an: Antara Inovasi Metodologis Dan Problem Epistemologis.” Iqtishaduna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Ekonomi Syari’ah 7, no. 2 (2025): 1882–1900. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/iqtishaduna.v7i2.64267.

Toedien, Faisal Amir, and Eva Dewi. “Integration of Religion and Science in Nidhal Guessoum’s Thought: An Epistemological Analysis and Its Implications for Islamic Education.” AJIS: Academic Journal of Islamic Studies, November 2025, 347–70. https://doi.org/10.29240/ajis.v10i2.14954.

Viciana, Hugo, Aníbal M. Astobiza, Angelo Fasce, and Ivar R. Hannikainen. “Scientifically Together, Politically Apart?” Science & Education 34, no. 5 (October 2025): 3615–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00587-z.

Zarkasyi, Hamid Fahmy. “Religion in the Postmodern Thought.” Journal of Islamic and Occidental Studies 2, no. 1 (June 2024): 67–81. https://doi.org/10.21111/jios.v2i1.41.

Ziauddin Sardar. Islamic Futures: The Shape of Ideas to Come. London: Mansell Publishing, 1985.

Downloads

Published

30-06-2026

How to Cite

Mohammad Muslih, Erni Puryati Ningsih, Rahmat Nur Rifa Da'i, and Adi Setiawan. 2026. “Multilevel Reading As an Epistemological Model of Islam-Science Integration: A Critical Study of Nidhal Guessoum”. Journal of Islamic and Occidental Studies 4 (1):115-37. https://doi.org/10.21111/jios.v4i1.107.