Nihilisme Normatif Kontemporer: Studi Kritis terhadap Anti Otoritas dalam Memahami Teks Islam

Contemporary Normative Nihilism: A Critical Study on Anti-Authority in Understanding Islamic Text (Nash)

Authors

  • Hijriy Fatha Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah (STIS) Hidayatullah Balikpapan-Indonesia
  • Sylmawan Rahmat Al-Azhar University, Cairo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21111/jios.v2i2.43

Keywords:

Nihilism, Philosophy, Antiauthority, Relativity, Relativism

Abstract

In the field of philosophy, the concept of nihilism has developed, namely a conception that denies all existing values and norms. Thus, this gives rise to the understanding of the relativity of truth. This ideology assumes that there is no absolute truth. All current statements and understandings are not necessarily true and may very well be wrong, including the interpretations of Islamic scholars towards Islamic religious texts. This understanding is used as justification for everyone who wants to interpret religious texts as they wish. Of course, this is very contrary to the wisdom of the ulama. Adherents of this understanding equate the Qur'an with other texts to the point of calling the Qur'an a cultural product and historical text.

References

’Abdolkarim Soroush. Reason, Freedom, & Democracy in Islam. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Admin Hidcom. “Framing Pembubaran MUI Adalah Teror Terhadap Islam Wasathiyah di Indonesia.” Hidayatullah.com, 2021. https://hidayatullah.com/berita/nasional/2021/11/18/220136/framing-pembubaran-mui-adalah-teror-terhadap-islam-wasathiyah-di-indonesia.html.

Agustin, Sherly Dwi. “Dari Fikih Otoriter Ke Fikih Otoritatif: Ulama Menurut Khaled Abou El Fadl.” Tanwir.id, 2022. https://tanwir.id/dari-fikih-otoriter-ke-fikih-otoritatif-ulama-menurut-khaled-abou-el-fadl/.

Al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam an Exposition of The Fundamental Elements of The Worlview of Islam. Johor Baru: UTM Press, 2014.

Al-Mas’udah. “Agama dan Pemikiran Keagamaan (Membedah Teori Abdulkarim Soroush Tentang Qabdh Wa Bast).” Jurnal Al-Himayah 2, no. 1 (2018): 1–16.

Al-Qaradhawi, Yusuf. Al-Ijtihād fī Al-Syarī‘ah Al-Islāmiyyah. Mesir: Dar al-Qalam, 1996.

Amin, Ma‘ruf, Yunahar Ilyas, Ichwan Sam, and Amirsyah. Mengenal dan Mewaspadai Penyimpangan Syi‘ah di Indonesia. Depok: Al-Qalam, 2020.

Aneesuddin, Mir. Buku Saku Ayat-Ayat Semesta. Jakarta: Zaman, 2014.

Arif, Syamsuddin. Islam Dan Diabolisme Intelektual. Jakarta: INSISTS, 2018.

———. Orientalis dan Diabolisme Pemikiran. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 2008.

Associated Press. “Time Bomb: Situation Tense, Anger Rising in Hot Spot of Iran Anti-Hijab Protests.” India Today, 2022. https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/time-bomb-situation-tense-anger-rising-hot-spot-iran-anti-hijab-protests-2283467-2022-10-10.

Badi’, Ahmad. “Kritik Otoritarianisme Hukum Islam (Kajian Pemikiran Khaled M. Abou Al Fadl).” Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman 27, no. 1 (January 5, 2016). https://doi.org/10.33367/tribakti.v27i1.260.

Baghramian, Maria. Relativism. Routledge, 2004.

Crosby, Donald A. Concise Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London & New York: Routledge, 2000.

Emhaf. Nietzsche: Sebuah Catatan Pergumulan Dan Bentrokan. Yogyakarta: Anak Hebat Indonesia, 2017.

Evandio, Akbar. “Wacana Pembubaran MUI, Wapres: Sangat Tidak Rasional!” Bisnis.com, 2021. https://kabar24.bisnis.com/read/20211123/15/1469560/wacana-pembubaran-mui-wapres-sangat-tidak-rasional.

Fadl, Khaled Abou El. Speaking in God’s Name: Islamic Law, Authority, and Women. Oxford: Oneworld, 2010.

Hamat, Anung Al. “Analisis Fatwa MUI Tahun 2007 Tentang Sepuluh Kriteria Aliran Sesat.” Yudisia: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam 8, no. 2 (April 8, 2018): 351. https://doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v8i2.3244.

Hanafi, Hasan, Muhammad, and ’Abid Al-Jabiri. Dialog Timur dan Barat: Menuju Rekonstruksi Metodologis Pemikiran Politik Arab yang Progresif dan Egaliter. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD, 2015.

Huda, Lalu Nurul Bayanil. Kritik Terhadap Model Pembacaan Kontemporer (Kajian Berdasarkan Worldview Islam). Edited by Hamid Fahmy Zarkasyi. Ponorogo: Centre For Islamic and Occidental Studies (CIOS), 2015.

Huda, M Thoriqul, Eka Rizki Amalia, and Hendri Utami Utami. “Deskripsi Tafsir Al-Misbah dan Al-Azhar Tentang Toleransi dalam Al-Quran.” Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman 30, no. 2 (July 3, 2019): 255–70. https://doi.org/10.33367/tribakti.v30i2.657.

Husaini, Adian. Virus Liberalisme di Perguruan Tinggi Islam. Depok: Gema Insani Press, 2009.

Ichwan, Moch Nur. “MUI, Gerakan Islamis, dan Umat Mengambang (Indonesian Council of Ulama, Islamist Movements, and Floating Umma).” Maarif: Arus Pemikiran Islam Dan Sosial 11, no. 2 (2016).

Indra, Indra. “Analisis Hubungan Islam, Spritualitas, Dan Perubahan Sosial.” Tsaqafah: Jurnal Peradaban Islam 14, no. 2 (November 27, 2018): 349. https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v14i2.2292.

Jahanbakhsh, Forough. Islam, Democracy and Religious Modernism in Iran, 1953–2000: From Bazargān to Soroush. Brill, 2001.

Kaldis, Byron. Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Washington DC: SAGE Publication Inc, 2013.

Kartanegara, Mulyadhi, and Abdullah Ali. Abdul Karim Soroush: Menggugat Otoritas Dan Tradisi Agama. Bandung: Mizan, 2002.

Kazemi, Ahmad. “Islam, Democracy and Religious Modernism in Iran (1953–2000) from Bazargan to Soroush.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 34, no. 1 (February 15, 2001): 175–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743802431066.

Khairurrijal. “Filsafat Bahasa Kontemporer Dan Kritik Al-Attas.” Islamia: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Peradaban Islam 11, no. 2 (2017).

Makmur, Jamal. “Peran Fatwa MUI dalam Berbangsa dan Bernegara.” Wahana Akademika: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Sosial 5, no. 2 (January 30, 2019): 41. https://doi.org/10.21580/wa.v5i2.3226.

McDonough, Richard M. Martin Heidegger’s Being and Time. Swiss: Peter Lang, 2006.

Muhtador, Moh. “Pergulatan Otoritas dan Otoritarianisme dalam Penafsiran (Pembacaan Hermenuetis Khaled Abou El Fadl).” Jurnal Qof 2, no. 1 (2018).

Mustofa, Imron. “‘Evolusi-Devolusi’ Pemerintahan Demokratis dalam Nalar Filosofis Abdolkarim Soroush.” Kalimah: Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Pemikiran Islam 19, no. 2 (October 5, 2021). https://doi.org/10.21111/klm.v19i2.6732.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Will to Power by Friedrich Nietzsche-Delphi Classics (Illustrated). Delphi Classics, 2017.

Pitaloka, Dyah Ayu. “Aksi Protes, Perempuan Iran Potong Rambut Dan Bakar Kerudung.” Ngopibareng, 2022. https://www.ngopibareng.id/read/aksi-protes-perempuan-iran-potong-rambut-dan-bakar-kerudung.

Qathan, Manna’ Khalil. Mabāḥits fī ‘Ulūm Al-Qur’ān. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 1988.

Rahmat, Aulia. “Abdulkarim Soroush Dan Evolusi Pemahaman Agama: Sebuah Asumsi Dasar Dalam Ijtihad.” Ijtihad 37, no. 2 (2021): 1–10. https://journals.fasya.uinib.org/index.php/ijtihad/article/view/110.

Raisuni, Ahmad, and Muhammad Jamal. Al-Ijtihād: Al-Nāsh, Al-Wāqi‘, Al-Mashlaḥah. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr al-Ma‘āshir, 2000.

Ro’uf, Abdul Mukti. “Posmodernisme: Dampak dan Penerapannya Pada Studi Islam.” Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 19, no. 1 (2019): 155–76. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajsk.v19i1.4161.

Salim, Fahmi. Tafsir Sesat: 58 Essai Kritis Wacana Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: Gema Insani, 2013.

Shalahuddin, Henri. “Kredibilitas Ilmu Tafsir dalam Menegakkan Konsep Wahyu Al-Qur’an.” Islamia: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Peradaban Islam 6, no. 1 (2012).

Soroush, Abdolkarim, Mahmoud Sadri, and Ahmad Sadri. Reason, Freedom, & Democracy in Islam: Essential Writings of ʻAbdolkarim Soroush. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Stassen, Manfred. Philosophical and Political Writings: Martin Heidegger. New York: Continuum, 2003.

Sufyan, Abu, and Irwan Irwan. “Agama vs Ilmu Agama: Sebuah Pembacaan Teori Epistemologis Abdul Karim Soroush.” Tajdid: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Dan Kemanusiaan 6, no. 1 (April 13, 2022): 14–21. https://doi.org/10.52266/tadjid.v6i1.734.

Suharto, Ugi. Nafi, Isbat, dan Kalam: Bunga Rampai Postulat Pemikiran Islam. Bandung: Pimpin & Bentala, 2022.

Taufiq, M., and Muhammad Ilham. “Pemikiran Hermeneutika Khaled M. Abou El Fadl: Dari Fikih Otoriter Ke Fikih Otoritatif.” Taqnin: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum 3, no. 1 (2021).

Titus, Harold H, Marilyn S.Smith, and Richard T.Nolan. Persoalan-Persoalan Filsafat. Edited by H. M Rasyidi. 1st ed. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1984.

Titus, Harold Hopper, and Marilyn S. Smith. Living Issues in Philosophy. New York: D. Van Nostrand Company, 1974.

Kementrian Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia. “Wacana Pembubaran MUI, Wapres: Tuntutan Tersebut Tidak Rasional,” 2021. https://www.setneg.go.id/baca/index/wacana_pembubaran_mui_wapres_tuntutan_tersebut_tidak_rasional.

Wibowo, A. Setyo. Gaya Filsafat Nietzsche. Yogyakarta: Galangpress Group, 2004.

Wijaya, Aksin. Menalar Islam: Menyingkap Argumen Epistemologis Abdul Karim Soroush. Jakarta: Diva Press, 2021.

Zarkasyi, Hamid Fahmy. “Liberalisasi Pemikiran Islam.” Tsaqafah 5, no. 1 (2007): 1–28.

———. Liberalisasi Pemikiran Islam. Ponorogo: CIOS, 2020.

———. Liberalisasi Pemikiran Islam (Gerakan Bersama Missionaris, Orientalis Dan Kolonialis). Ponorogo: CIOS, 2010.

Zubaidi, Sujiat, and Mohammad Muslih. Kritik Epistemologi Dan Model Pembacaan Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: UNIDA Gontor Press & LESFI, 2020.

Downloads

Published

28-12-2024

How to Cite

Fatha, Hijriy, and Sylmawan Rahmat. 2024. “Nihilisme Normatif Kontemporer: Studi Kritis Terhadap Anti Otoritas Dalam Memahami Teks Islam: Contemporary Normative Nihilism: A Critical Study on Anti-Authority in Understanding Islamic Text (Nash)”. Journal of Islamic and Occidental Studies 2 (2). Hamid Fahmy Zarkasyi, Misykat: Refleksi Tentang Westernisasi, Liberalisasi, Dan Islam, 1st ed. (Ponorogo: Insists dan MIUMI, 2012).:198-218. https://doi.org/10.21111/jios.v2i2.43.